Many units across our campus provide me with review rubrics that have uneven offsets between ratings. For example: 0, 1, 3, 5 instead of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. This results in a "score" of X out of X. It is difficult to explain how Award Management needs me to input rubric scores, so it would be helpful to be able to set uneven offsets when needed.
Client Name "shard name" | ku |
Employee Name | Taylor Wilson |
That helps, thanks Taylor!
No - sorry! I phrased that in an odd way. I used an example where there were even offsets :) I received one rubric recently that had 0 - 3 - 5. So in order to make it work the way they wanted to, I would need an offset of 3, then an offset of 2. Does that make more sense? In the meantime I've been converting rubrics to even offsets but I am sure at some point a department will throw a fit.
Thanks, Taylor!
Is the issue that the uneven offsets need to start with 0?
If you set the minimum to 1 and then use an offset of 2, the rubric will show 1, 3, 5, 7, up to the max that you set. Will that work for the scenarios you describe?