control reviewer field visibility on a per opportunity or per reviewer group basis
They have a need to show some information to certain reviewers based on the requirements of the scholarship. And, they don't want to show things like SAT or ACT on ALL scholarships to avoid folks using those numbers to review because they are not supposed to. In short, they need to control which general applications fields are visible to reviewers at the opportunity level. UCSD also has this need as does Kosciusko Foundation.
-
Deleted User
- Feb 3 2016
- Shipped
| Employee Name | Matt Thomas, David Welch, Brooke Butler |
| Client Name "shard name" | tcc, ncsu, ucsd, unco, slu, uwosh, schoolcraft, hamptonroadscf, memphis, kccd, csueastbay, georgiasouthern, colostate, mtsu, brown, IU, msu, wisc, uvu, unc |
| User | Opportunity Admin, Reviewer |
| Functional Unit | Questions |
-
Opportunity Specific Reviewable Fields
Merged Currently, a form field is either Reviewable or not. What the client would like is to make the field reviewable for some review groups but not for others. For example, an essay question should not be considered as part of the evaluation. Even thou...0 Shipped
-
Customer wants to be able to restrict fields from certain reviewers
Merged The customer wants to have the ability to restrict certain fields from certain review groups...0 Shipped
-
Reviewing Apply To questions before they see the general application
Merged Problem: Reviewers, when reviewing, have to scroll down past the general application and import information to get to the meat and potatoes of the apply to scholarship- the specific questions. Most times these questions are all they care about ...0 Shipped
-
Indicate which data fields are reviewable by opportunity.
Merged Client finds data fields can be sensitive for some Reviewers and not for others. They feel that the ability to make certain fields not reviewable on a site wide level does not serve their needs and they want the ability to restrict the fields only...0 Shipped
-
Allow fields to be reviewable on a secondary reviewer group basis
Merged Problem: allow individual reviewer groups to also have settings to make fields reviewable (rather than just at the top level) so that one group can see some information that another cannot and vice versa
0
Shipped
Related Enhancements
Iowa State University needs this as well! The sooner the better.
Please see additional use case in merged enhancement from Texas Exes; description below -
"Texas Exes has an issue with wanting to hide certain answers to application questions from different reviewer groups. For instance, one reviewer group does not consider test scores so we want to hide this information from these reviewers but another reviewer group does consider test scores so we want those answers to be visible to those reviewers. "
Hi Nick, in general, we mark items as "planned" that are coming in the next 6 months or so. The timing is never set in stone, as other higher priority items may arise, but that's the general time frame we aim for.
I submitted this idea elsewhere not knowing it had already been submitted. I see that this is "planned" but the idea was submitted in 2016. When can we expect this enhancement?
Holland College would also like this (they don't want to show fin need data to all reviewers, just those reviewing fin need scholarships).
This continues to be a huge pain point at UW Madison and one that we consistently hear from our scholarship administrators. With so many scholarships being run that need their reviewers to see different import fields, there is no way to be able to make the decision on the system level.
Jennifer Carter from Middle Tennessee State U would like this ability, or the ability to only show reviewers questions that are relevant to the opportunity's qualifications
Mary Derby from uvu also would like this enhancement
SLU would like this as well. They want a reviewer group to be able to review on the conditional application anonymously, and they do not wish to stagger their review periods to take advantage of system wide anonymous setting. Thank you!
UNC would also need this.
UCLA would also like this functionality -
"At the 2018 Conference I asked about a long-term request- allowing reviewers to have separate viewing permissions, similar to detaching groups from the template to customize rubrics. I currently have 2 major types of reviewer-Internal, such as faculty and staff- and External-such as Alumni or retired faculty.
We've been lucky so far that only one group has been reviewing at a time thus far, but that is about to end in January. It is highly probable groups will be reviewing different opportunities/applications at the same time and I can't keep changing the individual viewing permissions on each question.
In addition, I simply CANNOT let Alumni see any kind of FERPA-related data or even ethnicity, because of CA Prop 209 laws. I may need it to match the students to an opportunity preference, but it can't be seen by any external reviewer. Internal staff at least have to complete the University's FERPA contract each year, but even asking external reviewers to sign something is too far outside the rules to work for us."
11/13/18: Carrie and I had a call with Keith Brown from UW-Madison He wanted to reiterate the importance of this particular request.
Ryan Rademacher at msu would also like this enhancement
Frances Spencer of NCSU - Raleigh would like to be able to toggle by review group as well
https://utifoundation.academicworks.com would like this as well!
umass would really like this as well!
Coloradomesa would benefit from this. They want to anonymize applicants for only the reviewer group that reviews on the GA. They currently workaround it by having a different review period open for that group.
https://coloradomesa.academicworks.com
UCSD would also like this as well, specifically:
They want to be able to change visibility on certain questions at the reviewer group level; as one group may want to see citizenship status, but another this would not be a consideration.
NCSU Wants this as well. Customize reviewer data visibility ability to uncheck data from being visible per reviewer group
Indiana (IU) would LOVE to see this feature. It's a huge hurdle for them currently.