control reviewer field visibility on a per opportunity or per reviewer group basis

They have a need to show some information to certain reviewers based on the requirements of the scholarship. And, they don't want to show things like SAT or ACT on ALL scholarships to avoid folks using those numbers to review because they are not supposed to. In short, they need to control which general applications fields are visible to reviewers at the opportunity level. UCSD also has this need as does Kosciusko Foundation.
  • Deleted User
  • Feb 3 2016
  • Shipped
Employee Name Matt Thomas, David Welch, Brooke Butler
Client Name "shard name" tcc, ncsu, ucsd, unco, slu, uwosh, schoolcraft, hamptonroadscf, memphis, kccd, csueastbay, georgiasouthern, colostate, mtsu, brown, IU, msu, wisc, uvu, unc
User Opportunity Admin, Reviewer
Functional Unit Questions
  • Attach files
  • Ann Wessman commented
    October 11, 2019 19:56

    Iowa State University needs this as well!  The sooner the better.

  • Admin
    Carrie Goldberger commented
    October 11, 2019 19:38

    Please see additional use case in merged enhancement from Texas Exes; description below -

    "Texas Exes has an issue with wanting to hide certain answers to application questions from different reviewer groups. For instance, one reviewer group does not consider test scores so we want to hide this information from these reviewers but another reviewer group does consider test scores so we want those answers to be visible to those reviewers. "

  • Admin
    Carrie Goldberger commented
    August 23, 2019 21:08

    Hi Nick, in general, we mark items as "planned" that are coming in the next 6 months or so. The timing is never set in stone, as other higher priority items may arise, but that's the general time frame we aim for.

  • Nick Bromley commented
    August 22, 2019 20:28

    I submitted this idea elsewhere not knowing it had already been submitted.  I see that this is "planned" but the idea was submitted in 2016.  When can we expect this enhancement?

  • Mary Trautman commented
    June 19, 2019 19:58

    Holland College would also like this (they don't want to show fin need data to all reviewers, just those reviewing fin need scholarships).

  • Stephanie Parmentier commented
    May 29, 2019 22:28

    This continues to be a huge pain point at UW Madison and one that we consistently hear from our scholarship administrators. With so many scholarships being run that need their reviewers to see different import fields, there is no way to be able to make the decision on the system level.

  • Guest commented
    February 21, 2019 15:59

    Jennifer Carter from Middle Tennessee State U would like this ability, or the ability to only show reviewers questions that are relevant to the opportunity's qualifications 

  • Guest commented
    February 07, 2019 22:56

    Mary Derby from uvu also would like this enhancement

  • Guest commented
    January 25, 2019 21:27

    SLU would like this as well.  They want a reviewer group to be able to review on the conditional application anonymously, and they do not wish to stagger their review periods to take advantage of system wide anonymous setting.  Thank you!

  • Guest commented
    November 28, 2018 17:42

    UNC would also need this.

  • Guest commented
    November 14, 2018 23:15

    UCLA would also like this functionality -

    "At the 2018 Conference I asked about a long-term request- allowing reviewers to have separate viewing permissions, similar to detaching groups from the template to customize rubrics. I currently have 2 major types of reviewer-Internal, such as faculty and staff- and External-such as Alumni or retired faculty.

    We've been lucky so far that only one group has been reviewing at a time thus far, but that is about to end in January. It is highly probable groups will be reviewing different opportunities/applications at the same time and I can't keep changing the individual viewing permissions on each question.

    In addition, I simply CANNOT let Alumni see any kind of FERPA-related data or even ethnicity, because of CA Prop 209 laws. I may need it to match the students to an opportunity preference, but it can't be seen by any external reviewer. Internal staff at least have to complete the University's FERPA contract each year, but even asking external reviewers to sign something is too far outside the rules to work for us."

  • Guest commented
    November 13, 2018 18:45

    11/13/18: Carrie and I had a call with Keith Brown from UW-Madison  He wanted to reiterate the importance of this particular request. 

  • Deleted User commented
    July 19, 2018 18:37

    Ryan Rademacher at msu would also like this enhancement

  • Guest commented
    June 18, 2018 15:02

    Frances Spencer of NCSU - Raleigh would like to be able to toggle by review group as well

  • Deleted User commented
    April 24, 2018 14:23

    https://utifoundation.academicworks.com would like this as well!

  • Deleted User commented
    April 20, 2018 16:06

    umass would really like this as well!

  • Deleted User commented
    March 08, 2018 23:11

    Coloradomesa would benefit from this.  They want to anonymize applicants for only the reviewer group that reviews on the GA.  They currently workaround it by having a different review period open for that group.

    https://coloradomesa.academicworks.com

  • Deleted User commented
    March 05, 2018 17:30

    UCSD would also like this as well, specifically:

    They want to be able to change visibility on certain questions at the reviewer group level; as one group may want to see citizenship status, but another this would not be a consideration. 

  • Guest commented
    November 02, 2017 21:20

    NCSU Wants this as well. Customize reviewer data visibility ability to uncheck data from being visible per reviewer group 

  • Deleted User commented
    August 17, 2017 21:09

    Indiana (IU) would LOVE to see this feature. It's a huge hurdle for them currently. 

  • Load older comments