Currently the message template that are dependent on scope say they are sent to "relevant Opportunity Administrators". This is incomplete in that the messages are also sent to System Administrators with the scope. The language should reflect that.

As departments within the college learn more about Award Management, they may wish to utilize a flexible application to gather information from students. Currently, there is no way to change a type. A new portfolio must be created with may detach ...

I don't know functionally if this would be possible, but The University of Texas at Arlington would like to be able to have blind reference reviews. Their committee members may know the professors that submitted the reference and it may bias their...

They would like their users to not be able to edit the description, yet still be able to edit questions and quals. "This is a field that only our CSU Foundation folks (system administrators) should be able to update. We enter the criteria for o...

Allow schools to add visuals such as campus and student pictures to the list of opportunities, sign-in page, application, and post-acceptance area. The system works well, but it would be nice to make it more visually appealing.

Customers would like some higher level of control over permissions, e.g., who has the ability to edit opportunities.

SAs want to be able to order the way profiles appear on /donors to put more high profile ones toward the top.

It can be difficult for OAs to visually distinguish qualification groups, especially if there are several similar ones in a row. If we did a simple enumeration, it would help them tell them apart.